RefereeVision's user profile page. Match highlights, posts and more on site!

TC3 Pinar Karsiyaka vs Happy Casa Brindisi Fake Being Fouled Basketball Champions League

Blue 9 receives the ball in the corner and jumps to attempt a 3-point shot. After releasing the ball, the referee calls a technical foul to Blue 9 for faking being fouled. Article 33.16 Fake is any action by a player to simulate that he has been fouled or to make theatrical exaggerated movements in order to create an opinion of being fouled and therefore gaining an advantage. Article 36.2.1 A technical foul is a player non-contact foul of a behavioural nature including, but not limited to: Fake being fouled Article 36.3.2 The opponents shall be awarded 1 free throw. The game shall be resumed as follows: The free throw shall be administered immediately. After the free throw, the throw-in shall be administered by the team which had control of the ball or was entitled to the ball when the technical foul was called, from the place nearest to where the ball was located when the game was stopped. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. There was no contact created by the defender. Blue 9 fell to the floor pretending he had been fouled. The White team shall attempt 1 free throw with no line-up and the White team shall have the ball for a throw-in as they had the possession of the ball when the technical foul was called.

TC4 Türk Telekom vs Igokea Fake being fouled & AOS Basketball Champions League

White 33 receives a pass in the post area, whilst being guarded by Blue 23. White 33 turns inside his cylinder and Blue 23 falls to the floor. The referee calls a technical foul to Blue 23 for faking being fouled and awards White 33 field goal. Article 16.1.1 A goal is made when a live ball enters the basket from above and remains within or passes through the basket entirely. Article 10.4 The ball does not become dead and the goal counts if made when: The ball is in the control of a player in the act of shooting for a field goal who finishes his shot with a continuous motion which started before a foul is charged on any opponents’ player or on any person permitted to sit on the opponents’ team bench. Article 15.1.3 The act of shooting in a continuous movement on drives to the basket or other moving shots: Begins when the ball has come to rest in the player’s hand(s), upon completion of a dribble or a catch in the air and the player starts, in the judgment of the referee, the shooting motion preceding the release of the ball for a field goal. Article 36.3.2 The opponents shall be awarded 1 free throw. The game shall be resumed as follows: If a valid field goal, or a last free throw is scored, the game shall be resumed with a throw-in from any place behind the end line. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. When the technical foul was called, White 33 had already started his act of shooting, so the ball doesn’t become dead and the goal, if made, counts. Any White Team player shall attempt one free throw with no line-up and then the Blue team shall have a throw-in from an y place behind their end line as after any basket.

TC3 Rytas Vilnius vs SIG Strasbourg Traveling & UF Basketball Champions League

White 23 steals the ball and starts a to transition, ending it with a successful lay-up. Then a time-out is granted to the Black team. Article 25.2.1 A player who catches the ball while he is progressing, or upon completion of a dribble, may take two steps in coming to a stop, passing or shooting the ball. After receiving the ball, a player shall release the ball to start his dribble before his second step. Article 37.1.1 An unsportsmanlike foul is a player contact which, in the judgement of a referee is: An illegal contact caused by the player from behind or laterally on an opponent who is progressing towards the opponent’s basket and there are no other players between the progressing player, the ball and the basket. This applies until the offensive player begins his act of shooting. Outcome: Incorrect decision from the referees. White 23 gest the control of the ball with his right foot on the floor. Then he puts his left foot on the floor (first step) and then his right foot again (second step) before releasing the ball to start his dribble. This is a travelling violation. Then, the contact created by Black 22 on the dribbler was illegal and was committed before the dribbler gathered the ball to start his act of shooting. Thus, an unsportsmanlike foul should have been called to Black 22, cancel the basket and 2 free throws should have been awarded to White 23, followed by a White team throw-in from the throw-in line in their frontcourt and 14 seconds on the shot clock. This clip is a good example to insist on the importance of an active mindset of the referees, always looking for the illegal actions that could occur.

TC1 Nizhny Novgorod vs Falco Szombathely Goal Tending Basketball Champions League

In the last 2 minutes of the fourth quarter, Black 5 makes a lay-up and White 18 blocks the shot. The referee calls a goal tending violation and awards 2 points to Black 5. Article 31.2.1 Goaltending occurs during a shot for a field goal when a player touches the ball while it is completely above the level of the ring and: It is on its downward flight to the basket, or After it has touched the backboard. The following game situations may be reviewed F.3.2 When the game clock shows 2:00 minutes or less in the fourth quarter and in each overtime: whether a goaltending or basket interference violation was called correctly. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. The IRS was correctly used to determine that White 18 blocked the shot on its upward flight, so no violation had occurred. The 2 points are cancelled and as no team had control of the ball, the game was resumed according to the alternating possession procedure, throw-in for the Black team as they were entitled to the next alternating possession throw-in.

TC2 ERA Nymburk vs Tofas Bursa Shot clock violation and IRS Basketball Champions League

During the third quarter, the referees call a shot clock violation because they understand that the yellow light on the backboard flashed on when the ball was still in contact with Green 0 hands. This player and the Green team Head Coach request the use of IRS to review the play. Article 29.1.1 To constitute a shot for a field goal within 24 seconds: The ball must leave the player's hand(s) before the shot clock signal sounds, and After the ball has left the player's hand(s), the ball must touch the ring or enter the basket. Article 29.1.2 When the backboard is equipped with yellow lighting along the top edge of the perimeter, the lighting takes precedence over the shot clock signal sound. The following game situations may be reviewed: F.3.2 When the game clock shows 2:00 minutes or less in the fourth quarter and in each overtime, whether a shot for a successful field goal was released before the shot clock signal sounded. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. The ball was still in contact with the shooter's hands when the yellow lighting on the backboard indicated the end of the shot clock period. This game situation can only be reviewed during the last 2 minutes of the fourth quarter or the last 2 minutes of the overtime.

TC1 SIG Strasbourg vs VEF Riga UF Basketball Champions League

In the last minute of the game, White 3 secures a defensive rebound and starts the offensive transition. Blue 4 comes close to him and a contact occurs. The referees call a personal foul to Blue 4. Article 37.1.1 An unsportsmanlike foul is a player contact which, in the judgement of a referee is: An unnecessary contact caused by the defensive player in order to stop the progress of the offensive team in transition. Outcome: Incorrect decision from the referees. The illegal contact created by Blue 4 is an unnecessary contact in order to stop the progress of the White team in transition, so an unsportsmanlike foul should have been called. White 3 should have been awarded 2 free throws, followed by a White team throw-in at the throw-in line in their frontcourt and 14 seconds on the shot clock. According to the IRS rule, the following game situation may be reviewed: F.3.3 During any time of the game, whether a personal, unsportsmanlike or disqualifying foul met the criteria for such a foul or shall be upgraded or downgraded or shall be considered as a technical foul.

TC4 Pinar Karsiyaka vs Fortitudo Bologna Blocked Shot Basketball Champions League

TC2 Hapoel Unet Credit Holon vs AEK Goal Tending Basketball Champions League

Yellow 4 goes for a lay-up and defender Black 35 blocks the shot. The referee calls a goal tending violation and awards 2 points to Yellow 4. Article 31. 2.1 Goaltending occurs during a shot for a field goal when a player touches the ball while it is completely above the level of the ring and; It is on its downward flight to the basket, or After it has touched the backboard. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. Black 35 touched the ball on its downward flight to the basket while it was completely above the level of the ring on a shot for a field goal. 2 points shall be awarded to Yellow 4.