RefereeVision's user profile page. Match highlights, posts and more on site!“” Report User |
Latest Posts
TC2 SIG Strasbourg vs Türk Telekom Travelling Basketball Champions League
White 33 receives the ball in his teams 3-point field goal area. He pump fakes his shot, thus avoiding Black 25 attempt to block the shot and then scores the basket. Article 25.2.1 A player who catches the ball while standing with both feet on the floor: To pass or shoot for a field goal, the player may jump off a pivot foot, but neither foot may be returned to the floor before the ball is released from the hand(s). Outcome: Incorrect decision from the referees. White 33 committed a travelling violation because he lifted both feet, and then returned to the floor before releasing the ball for a pass or a shot for a field goal.
TC3 Rytas Vilnius vs SIG Strasbourg Traveling & UF Basketball Champions League
White 23 steals the ball and starts a to transition, ending it with a successful lay-up. Then a time-out is granted to the Black team. Article 25.2.1 A player who catches the ball while he is progressing, or upon completion of a dribble, may take two steps in coming to a stop, passing or shooting the ball. After receiving the ball, a player shall release the ball to start his dribble before his second step. Article 37.1.1 An unsportsmanlike foul is a player contact which, in the judgement of a referee is: An illegal contact caused by the player from behind or laterally on an opponent who is progressing towards the opponent’s basket and there are no other players between the progressing player, the ball and the basket. This applies until the offensive player begins his act of shooting. Outcome: Incorrect decision from the referees. White 23 gest the control of the ball with his right foot on the floor. Then he puts his left foot on the floor (first step) and then his right foot again (second step) before releasing the ball to start his dribble. This is a travelling violation. Then, the contact created by Black 22 on the dribbler was illegal and was committed before the dribbler gathered the ball to start his act of shooting. Thus, an unsportsmanlike foul should have been called to Black 22, cancel the basket and 2 free throws should have been awarded to White 23, followed by a White team throw-in from the throw-in line in their frontcourt and 14 seconds on the shot clock. This clip is a good example to insist on the importance of an active mindset of the referees, always looking for the illegal actions that could occur.
TC1 Nizhny Novgorod vs Falco Szombathely Goal Tending Basketball Champions League
In the last 2 minutes of the fourth quarter, Black 5 makes a lay-up and White 18 blocks the shot. The referee calls a goal tending violation and awards 2 points to Black 5. Article 31.2.1 Goaltending occurs during a shot for a field goal when a player touches the ball while it is completely above the level of the ring and: It is on its downward flight to the basket, or After it has touched the backboard. The following game situations may be reviewed F.3.2 When the game clock shows 2:00 minutes or less in the fourth quarter and in each overtime: whether a goaltending or basket interference violation was called correctly. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. The IRS was correctly used to determine that White 18 blocked the shot on its upward flight, so no violation had occurred. The 2 points are cancelled and as no team had control of the ball, the game was resumed according to the alternating possession procedure, throw-in for the Black team as they were entitled to the next alternating possession throw-in.
TC1 SIG Strasbourg vs VEF Riga UF Basketball Champions League
In the last minute of the game, White 3 secures a defensive rebound and starts the offensive transition. Blue 4 comes close to him and a contact occurs. The referees call a personal foul to Blue 4. Article 37.1.1 An unsportsmanlike foul is a player contact which, in the judgement of a referee is: An unnecessary contact caused by the defensive player in order to stop the progress of the offensive team in transition. Outcome: Incorrect decision from the referees. The illegal contact created by Blue 4 is an unnecessary contact in order to stop the progress of the White team in transition, so an unsportsmanlike foul should have been called. White 3 should have been awarded 2 free throws, followed by a White team throw-in at the throw-in line in their frontcourt and 14 seconds on the shot clock. According to the IRS rule, the following game situation may be reviewed: F.3.3 During any time of the game, whether a personal, unsportsmanlike or disqualifying foul met the criteria for such a foul or shall be upgraded or downgraded or shall be considered as a technical foul.
TC2 Hapoel Unet Credit Holon vs AEK Goal Tending Basketball Champions League
Yellow 4 goes for a lay-up and defender Black 35 blocks the shot. The referee calls a goal tending violation and awards 2 points to Yellow 4. Article 31. 2.1 Goaltending occurs during a shot for a field goal when a player touches the ball while it is completely above the level of the ring and; It is on its downward flight to the basket, or After it has touched the backboard. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. Black 35 touched the ball on its downward flight to the basket while it was completely above the level of the ring on a shot for a field goal. 2 points shall be awarded to Yellow 4.
TC3 Hapoel Unet Credit Holon vs AEK Offensive Foul Basketball Champions League
While Black 20 is dribbling the ball on the perimeter, there is a contact in the corner between Yellow 4 and Black 24. The referee calls a team control foul to Black 24. Article 33.11 It is a foul by an offensive player without the ball to “push off” to: Get free to catch the ball. Prevent the defensive player from playing or attempting to play the ball. Create more space for himself Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. Yellow 4 was trying to prevent his opponent, Black 24, from moving closer to his teammate, Black 2, to play a lateral pick and roll. However, it was Black 24 who created the illegal contact by raising his arms and dislodging the arm of his opponent. The Yellow team shall be awarded a throw-in at the place nearest to where the foul occurred.
TC5 Limoges CSP vs Türk Telekom UF Basketball Champions League
Near to the end of the fourth period, Blue 5 secures a rebound. Defender Yellow 10 creates a contact and the referees call a personal foul. As the Yellow team was already in team fouls penalty in that quarter, Yellow 10 was awarded 2 free throws. Article 37.1.1 An unsportsmanlike foul is a player contact which, in the judgement of a referee is: Contact with an opponent and not legitimately attempting to directly play the ball within the spirit and intent of the rules. Outcome: Incorrect decision from the referees. The contact created by Yellow 10 cannot be considered as legitimately attempting to directly play the ball within the spirit and intent of the rules and therefore an unsportsmanlike foul should have been called. Blue 5 should have been awarded 2 free throws with no line-up and the Blue team should have been awarded a throw-in from the throw-in line in their front court. The shot clock should have been switched off as fewer than 14 seconds were remaining to the end of the game.
TC1 Nizhny Novgorod vs Pszczólka Start Lublin Held Ball Basketball Champions League
Black 9 starts a drive to the basket and two defenders try to prevent the score, with defender White 24 jumping to try to block the shot. The referee calls a held ball resulting in a jump ball situation. Article 33.2 Each player has the right to occupy any position (cylinder) on the playing court not already occupied by an opponent. This principle protects the space on the floor which he occupies and the space above him when he jumps vertically within that space. As soon as the player leaves his vertical position (cylinder) and body contact occurs with an opponent who had already established his own vertical position (cylinder), the player who left his vertical position (cylinder) is responsible for the contact. Article 33.15 Pushing is illegal personal contact with any part of the body where a player forcibly moves or attempts to move an opponent with or without the ball. Outcome: Incorrect decision from the referees. Once that Black 9 had returned to the floor after the unsuccessful attempt to score, White 24 created an illegal contact against him by invading his cylinder from behind and a personal foul for pushing should have been called.
Highlights
TC2: PROMITHEAS PATRAS vs. UNICAJA - Landing foul
Black 77 attempts a 3-point shot. The referees call a personal foul to White 4. The ball enters the basket so Black 77 is awarded 3 ...
TC1: LENOVO TENERIFE vs. TOFAS BURSA - Interference
During the last minute of the 4th quarter, Black 9 attempts a field goal, the ball hits the rim and then White 50 taps the ball away ...
TC3: TELEKOM BASKETS BONN vs. PERISTERI BWIN - Blocking foul
Blue 1 drives to the basket and jumps to make a lay-up. A contact with White 22 occurs. The referees call a blocking foul to White ...
TC2: HAPOEL HOLON vs. UCAM MURCIA - Cylinder Play
White 31 finishes his dribble guarded by Purple 11. The referee calls a travelling violation to White 31. Article 33.1: The defensive ...
Fentagin1980TVUser Detail Page
You can find user latest posts and related content on the page. Friends, comments for events / matches are also available on the page. Even you can find users who are same pleasure with current user.#Travel, #SupportYourTeam, #AllAboutSports