RefereeVision's user profile page. Match highlights, posts and more on site!

“”

 Report User

Latest Posts

Tough Call 2: Darussafaka v Hereda San Pablo Burgos - Travelling and screening
Tough Call 2: Darussafaka v Hereda San Pablo Burgos - Travelling and screening

Green 1 receives the ball and stops, he then starts a dribble being guarded by Grey 3. Green 35 attempts to screen Grey 3 and the referee calls a team control foul. Article 25.2.1 A player who catches the ball while he is progressing may take two steps when coming to a stop. The first step occurs when one foot or both feet touch the floor after gaining control of the ball. The second step occurs after the first step when the other foot touches the floor or both feet touch the floor simultaneously. Article 25.2.1 A player who catches the ball while standing with both feet on the floor To start a dribble, the pivot foot may not be lifted before the ball is released from the hand(s). Article 33.7 Legal screening is when the player who is screening an opponent: Was stationary inside his cylinder when contact occurred. Had both feet on the floor when contact occurred. Illegal screening is when the player who is screening an opponent: Was moving when contact occurred. Outcome: The first part of the play situation, an incorrect decision from the referee. Green 1 committed a travelling violation because he moved his pivot foot before releasing the ball to start the dribble. The second part of the play situation, correct decision from the referee. Green 35 was moving with his arms outside of his cylinder and created an illegal contact when trying to set the screen.



Tough Call 3: PAOK v SIG Strasbourg - Charge
Tough Call 3: PAOK v SIG Strasbourg - Charge

White 6 drives to the basket to make a lay-up and a contact occurs. The referees call a charging foul to White 6. Article 33.6 A player who has jumped into the air from a place on the playing court has the right to land on another place on the playing court provided that the landing place and the direct path between the take-off and landing place is not already occupied by an opponent at the time of take-off. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. Blue 5 set his position, outside the no-charge semicircle, before White 6 took off. Therefore, White 6 is responsible for the contact for invading Blue 5 cylinder.



Tough Call 1: Lenovo Tenerife v Pinar Karsiyaka - Blocking foul
Tough Call 1: Lenovo Tenerife v Pinar Karsiyaka - Blocking foul

Black 8 is bouncing the ball near the centre line when Black 6 runs towards him to set a screen. A contact occurs and the referee calls a personal foul to Black 6. Article 33.7 Illegal screening is when the player who is screening an opponent: Did not respect the elements of time and distance of an opponent in motion when contact occurred. If the opponent is in motion, the elements of time and distance shall apply. The screener must leave enough space so that the player who is being screened is able to avoid the screen by stopping or changing direction. The distance required is never less than 1 and never more than 2 normal steps. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. Black 6 committed a blocking foul on Yellow 6 because he didn’t respect the elements of time and distance.



Tough Call 1: Besiktas Icrypex v EWE Baskets Oldenburg - Screening
Tough Call 1: Besiktas Icrypex v EWE Baskets Oldenburg - Screening

Black 17 gives a hand-off pass and sets a screen. There is a contact with White 15 and the referee calls a team control foul for illegal screening. Article 33.7 Legal screening is when the player who is screening an opponent: Was stationary (inside his cylinder) when the contact occurred. Had both feet on the floor when the contact occurred. If the opponent is in motion, the elements of time and distance shall apply. The screener must leave enough space so that the player who is being screened is able to avoid the screen by stopping or changing direction. The distance required is never less than 1, and never more than 2, normal steps. A player who is legally screened is responsible for any contact with the player who has set the screen. Outcome: Incorrect decision from the referees. The screen set by Black 17 was legal. White 15 had enough distance to avoid the screen and he decided to bump into the screener in order to simulate that he had been fouled.



Tough Call 3: U-BT Cluj-Napoca vs Happy Casa Brindisi - Goaltending
Tough Call 3: U-BT Cluj-Napoca vs Happy Casa Brindisi - Goaltending

Blue 33 attempts a 2-point field goal and a foul is called to White 0. Then, White 30 touches the ball. After a short communication, the referees award Blue 33 a 2-point field goal and 1 free throw. Article 31.2.1 Goaltending occurs during a shot for a field goal when a player touches the ball while it is completely above the level of the ring and: It is on its downward flight to the basket. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. The ball is on its downward flight to the basket, so the basket counts, and 1 free throw is awarded to Blue 33 for the personal foul.



Tough Call 1: AEK vs Falco Szombathely - Control of the Act of Shooting
Tough Call 1: AEK vs Falco Szombathely - Control of the Act of Shooting

Yellow 17 attempts a 3-point jump shot. After the ball is released, the referee calls a personal foul to Black 24. Article 33.6 A player who has jumped into the air from a place on the playing court has the right to land again at the same place. Ha has the right to land on another place on the playing court provided that the landing place is not already occupied by an opponent at the time of take-off. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. Black 24 occupied a place on the playing court that was free when the shooter jumped for the shot. Therefore Black 24 is responsible from creating an illegal contact with the shooter during the shooter’s landing. Yellow 17 will be awarded 3 free throws.



Tough Call 5: Filou Oostende v Tofas Bursa - TV
Tough Call 5: Filou Oostende v Tofas Bursa - TV

Blue 2 is progressing when he receives the ball and starts a dribble. The referee calls a travelling violation. Article 25.2.1 A player who catches the ball while he is progressing shall release the ball to start his dribble before his second step. The first step occurs when one foot or both feet touch the floor after gaining control of the ball. The second step occurs after the first step when the other foot touches the floor or both feet touch the floor simultaneously. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees. When Blue 2 caught the ball, he had his right foot on the floor (the so-called gather step or step 0). His first step occurred when, after having caught the ball, his left foot touched the floor. His second step occurred when his right foot touched the floor. He released the ball after his second step, not before. This is a travelling violation.



Tough Call 2: Galatasaray Nef v PAOK mateco - Foul in the act of shooting
Tough Call 2: Galatasaray Nef v PAOK mateco - Foul in the act of shooting

White 1 jumps to attempt a 3-point field goal. The ball doesn’t enter the basket and the game continues. Article 33.6 A player who has jumped into the air from a place on the playing court has the right to land again at the same place. Outcome: Incorrect decision from the referees. Defender Black 16 occupied the landing spot of an airborne shooter, creating a contact on the shooter’s left foot. A personal foul should have been called to Black 16 and White 1 should have been awarded 3 free throws.



Highlights

TC4: Falco-Vulcano Szombathely vs. Nanterre 92 - Backcourt violation
TC4: Falco-Vulcano Szombathely vs. Nanterre 92 - Backcourt violation

Black #8 dribbles from his backcourt to his frontcourt. He steps with both feet on the frontcourt while the ball bounces twice in the ...



TC5: UCAM Murcia vs. ERA Nymburk - Technical, fifth foul
TC5: UCAM Murcia vs. ERA Nymburk - Technical, fifth foul

The referees call a foul on the act of shooting and award two free throws to White #19. After the first successful free throw, White ...



TC2: Rytas Vilnius vs. Unicaja - Charge
TC2: Rytas Vilnius vs. Unicaja - Charge

White #0 receives the ball during a fastbreak; Black #43 tries to defend the basket and a contact occurs. Both referees call a ...



TC1: Pallacanestro Reggiana vs. Aliaga Petkimspor - Blocking foul
TC1: Pallacanestro Reggiana vs. Aliaga Petkimspor - Blocking foul

After Blue #26's screen, he dives to the basket where he receives the ball. White #35 tries to defend the drive to basket and a ...



TC3: BAXI Manresa vs. Pallacanestro Reggiana - Charge without the ball
TC3: BAXI Manresa vs. Pallacanestro Reggiana - Charge without the ball

Red #97 receives the ball and jumps to make a layup. A contact with White #35 occurs and the referees call a blocking foul to ...



TC4: BAXI Manresa vs. Pallacanestro Reggiana - Transition foul
TC4: BAXI Manresa vs. Pallacanestro Reggiana - Transition foul

Red #32 steals the ball and tries to start a transition. A contact with White #16 occurs and the referees call a personal foul to White ...



TC1: Manisa Basket Divissa vs. Unicaja - Interference
TC1: Manisa Basket Divissa vs. Unicaja - Interference

White #35 receives a pass under the basket and shoots. Green #45 jumps to try and block the shot and the play continues.



TC2: ERA Nymburk vs. Falco-Vulcano Szombathely - Backcourt violation
TC2: ERA Nymburk vs. Falco-Vulcano Szombathely - Backcourt violation

White #11 attempts a three-point shot, which is unsuccessful. The ball rebounds, Black #25 grabs it, then White #73 taps it away, ...




« Previous Next »


User Detail Page

You can find user latest posts and related content on the page. Friends, comments for events / matches are also available on the page. Even you can find users who are same pleasure with current user.

#Travel, #SupportYourTeam, #AllAboutSports