Tough Call 5: Lenovo Tenerife v Pinar Karsiyaka - IRS for a potential Act of violence by @RefereeVision - Post Details

Tough Call 5: Lenovo Tenerife v Pinar Karsiyaka - IRS for a potential Act of violence

Yellow 9 passes the ball to his teammate Yellow 15, who then hands-off the ball back to Yellow 9. Afterwards, the referees stop the game when they see Yellow 15 on the floor. F-4.17 In situations where an act of violence occurs which is not called immediately, referees are authorised to stop the game at any time to review for any act of violence or potential act of violence. The referees must identify the need for the IRS review and the review must take place the first time the referees have stopped the game. If the IRS review provides evidence that an act of violence has occurred, the referees shall call the infraction and penalise all already called infractions including the act of violence in the order in which the infractions occurred. An act of violence is an act of force that causes or is intended to cause harm, or an act that results or could result in a risk of injury. An act that does not meet the criteria of a disqualifying foul, an unsportsmanlike foul for an excessive, hard contact or a technical foul for threatened violence is not an act of violence. Outcome: Correct decision from the referees, in accordance with the new Official Interpretation. The referees are authorised to use the IRS review to identify a potential act of violence. They stopped the game immediately without putting either team at a disadvantage. After the IRS review, they decided that the contact didn’t meet the criteria to be an act of violence. The game shall be resumed with a Yellow team throw-in from the place nearest to where the game was stopped and the Yellow team shall have the remaining time (14 seconds) on the shot clock (OBRI F-4.18).

Similar Posts!

TC3: Galatasaray MCT Technic vs. Pallacanestro Trieste - Fake being fouled
TC3: Galatasaray MCT Technic vs. Pallacanestro Trieste - Fake being fouled

Whilst White #10 is dribbling the ball, White #22 and Black #1 are moving, trying to get a good position on the court. The referee ...



TC2: MLP Academics Heidelberg vs. Promitheas Patras BC Vikos Cola - Blocking foul
TC2: MLP Academics Heidelberg vs. Promitheas Patras BC Vikos Cola - Blocking foul

White #32 is dribbling when a contact with Blue #43 occurs. The referee calls a blocking foul on Blue #43. Article 33.4: When ...



TC1: Galatasaray MCT Technic vs. Pallacanestro Trieste - Charge
TC1: Galatasaray MCT Technic vs. Pallacanestro Trieste - Charge

White #1 receives the ball in the low post whilst being guarded by Black #3. A contact occurs and the referee calls a blocking foul ...



TC2: Galatasaray vs. Unicaja - Defensive Foul
TC2: Galatasaray vs. Unicaja - Defensive Foul

Green #6 controls the ball when a contact occurs between White #7 and Green #55. The referees call a defensive foul to White #7.



TC2: Galatasaray vs. ERA Nymburk - Personal foul, held ball
TC2: Galatasaray vs. ERA Nymburk - Personal foul, held ball

Black #31 receives the ball under the basket and tries to shoot. Centre referee calls a personal foul in the act of shooting on White ...



TC3: Galatasaray vs. ERA Nymburk - Blocked shot
TC3: Galatasaray vs. ERA Nymburk - Blocked shot

Black #8 tries to dunk the ball and White #13 blocks the shot. Article 32.1.1: A foul is an infraction of the rules concerning illegal ...



TC1: Unicaja vs. Pallacanestro Reggiana - Technical foul
TC1: Unicaja vs. Pallacanestro Reggiana - Technical foul

During the first quarter, after a valid field goal by White #0, Green #45 is about to get the ball to take the throw-in from behind his ...



TC3: Falco-Vulcano Szombathely vs. Nanterre 92 - Unsportsmanlike foul
TC3: Falco-Vulcano Szombathely vs. Nanterre 92 - Unsportsmanlike foul

Black #8 receives the ball and starts a drive to the basket. Yellow #3 runs towards him and creates a contact. The referees call a ...