HighlightsA brief glimpse into the past
Venus Williams vs. Rebecca Peterson | 2019 Tianjin Open First Round | WTA Highlights
Subscribe to WTA on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/ Like WTA on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WTA Follow WTA on Twitter: ...
Venus Williams vs. Belinda Bencic | 2019 China Open Second Round | WTA Highlights
Subscribe to WTA on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/ Like WTA on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WTA Follow WTA on Twitter: ...
Serena Williams vs. Elina Svitolina Preview | Who will win? | 2019 US Open Semifinal
Subscribe to WTA on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=WTA Like WTA on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WTA Follow ...
E. Svitolina vs. V. Williams - Game Highlights
Svitolina defeats Williams and advances to the third round of the 2019 US Open.
A. Petkovic vs. M. Buzarnescu - Game Highlights
Petkovic defeats Buzarnescu and advances to the third round.
Venus Williams vs. Donna Vekic | 2019 Western & Southern Open Third Round | WTA Highlights
Subscribe to WTA on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/ Like WTA on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WTA Follow WTA on Twitter: ...
Venus Williams vs. Kiki Bertens | 2019 Western & Southern Open Second Round | WTA Highlights
Subscribe to WTA on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/ Like WTA on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WTA Follow WTA on Twitter: ...
Team, Place & City Details
Mihaela Buzărnescu
Mihaela Buzărnescu is a professional tennis player from Romania. She has a career-high WTA singles ranking of No.
Williams v. Mississippi
Williams v. Mississippi, 170 U.S. 213 , is a United States Supreme Court case that reviewed provisions of the 1890 Mississippi constitution and its statues that set requirements for voter registration, including poll tax, literacy tests, the grandfather clause, and the requirement that only registered voters could serve on juries.
Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.
Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co., 350 F.2d 445 (D.C. Cir.
Williams v. Pryor
Williams v. Pryor, 229 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir.
Williams v. Rhodes
Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 , was a case before the United States Supreme Court.
Williams v. Florida
Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 , is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fifth Amendment does not entitle a defendant in a criminal trial to refuse to provide details of his alibi witnesses to the prosecution, and that the Sixth Amendment does not require a jury to have 12 members.
Williams v. North Carolina (1942)
Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287 , is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the federal government determines marriage and divorce statuses between state lines.
Williams v. Lee
Williams v. Lee, 358 U.S. 217 , was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the State of Arizona does not have jurisdiction to try a civil case between a non-Indian doing business on a reservation with tribal members who reside on the reservation, the proper forum for such cases being the tribal court.
Williams v. Vidmar
Williams v. Vidmar, 367 F. Supp.
Williams v Carwardine
Williams v Carwardine [1833] EWHC KB J44 is an English contract law case which concerns how a contract comes about through the offer of a reward. It also raises interesting questions about the necessity of reliance on an offer in the formation of a contract.
Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd
Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls Ltd [1989] EWCA Civ 5 is a leading English contract law case. It decided that in varying a contract, a promise to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation will constitute good consideration so long as a benefit is conferred upon the promisee.