Chauncey Billups Exposes Chris Paul's Overrated Defense (Incomplete) - 2009 Playoffs 1st Rd by @Nobody Touches MJ - Post Details

Chauncey Billups Exposes Chris Paul's Overrated Defense (Incomplete) - 2009 Playoffs 1st Rd

Billups completely annihilated Chris Paul in the 2009 Playoffs, after Paul had his best statistical year - joining Magic and Kevin Johnson as the only players to average 20-10 on 50% in a season (Magic and KJ did it twice each). Significantly better scoring, AST:TO ratio, and astronomical efficiency while playing less MPG. To put Billups 66% 3PT in perspective, the highest FG% that Shaq shot in a playoff series was 66% in the 1995 ECF. People often criticize players such as Steph Curry for hiding on defense, which is justifiable. However, Chris Paul never receives criticism for his shameless hiding on defense during the 2009 Playoffs, avoiding Billups like the plague for long stretches. In avoiding Billups so often, CP3 was just as culpable for Billups' offensive success as the times that Billups lit him up head to head, since the supposed "best defensive PG in the game" (a complete farce in reality) didn't put it on himself to stop the other team's PG often enough. When CP3 did have the guts to actually defend Billups, Chauncey lit him up several times. Not only through scoring, but also when Billups blew past CP3 with dribble penetration to set up easy scores for other teammates. When CP3 was hiding on weaker offensive matchups, Billups still found ways to create shots for those players so that they could also expose CP3's weak defense. Billups' destruction of the overrated Chris Paul in the 2009 Playoffs, after his best statistical year no less, is one of many examples proving that Chris Paul is nowhere near the "elite" defender he is made out to me. Indeed, he is not even average, but one of the biggest defensive liabilities of any offensive superstar in NBA history. Billups from 2003 to 2009 was supremely successful at making his team better to a high degree, something Paul has never done. The Pistons had not made an ECF since 1991 before acquiring Billups, and then made 6 straight ECF under Billups, including 2 NBA Finals and a championship. Billups made the 2007 and 2008 ECF without the help of 4x DPOY Ben Wallace, and Billups also didn't have Larry Brown after the 2005 Finals, yet still made 3 more ECF without the Hall of Fame coach. Granted, the East was weak after 2006, but likewise the 2009 Pistons were so weak without Billups that they went from 6 straight ECF to 39-wins and a first-round 8-seed sweep in the weak East, even with Rasheed, Prince, and Hamilton on the team, after going to 6 straight ECF with Billups. Billups then came to the tougher Western Conference, and picked up where he left off, taking the 2009 Nuggets from a first round 8-seed sweep in 2008 to the 2009 WCF, while completely exposing and outplaying Paul in the process. In his first year in the tough Western Conference, Billups did what Paul hasn't been able to do in his entire career, and led a mediocre first round team to the 2009 WCF. And this wasn't even prime Billups. Billups proved that he could take any 8-seed team in the East or West that would normally get swept in the first round - even a losing 39-43 Pistons team, and make them a Conference Finals contender, regardless of his statistical production. That's far more impressive than a guy who puts up first-round inflated playoff stats and never played a playoff team that was good enough to make the Finals. Chris Paul is the guy you want on a fantasy team, but Billups is the guy you want on a championship team Billups also elevated Carmelo's game to a whole other level while playing with him in Denver. As of 2015, Carmelo has shot 50% in only 15 out of 66 playoff games in his career, but 10 of those 15 games came while playing with Billups in 2009 and 2010. Carmelo shot at least 50% in 10 out of 22 playoff games with Billups, but only shot 50% in 5 out of 44 of his remaining playoff games. Rip Hamilton also averaged 20+ ppg in 5 of 6 playoff runs with Billups from 2003 to 2008, but only 13.3 ppg and 13.0 ppg in his other 2 playoff runs as a starter without Billups. Paul has never shown that he can elevate his team or teammates like Billups did. If you want empty stats, take Chris Paul, but your team damn sure isn't going anywhere. If you want your team to win games and make several Conference Finals, at the very least, and a guy who can still outplay superstars like Kobe (2004) and Paul (2009) when he has to, Billups is the clear and obvious choice. Billups is also the only player to shoot 50/40/90 under the non-shortened 3PT line in an NBA Finals, with 51/47/93 in the 2004 Finals (min. 1.5 3PA/game, 3.0 FTA/game). Penny Hardaway did this with the shorter line in 1995. Read more at http://chrispauloverrated.blogspot.com SECTION 1 - The Myth That Chris Paul Doesn't Have Good Help SECTION 2 - The Myth That Chris Paul is an Elite Defender SECTION 3 - Why Chris Paul's Playoff Statistics Are Not as Impressive SECTION 4 - Chris Paul is Not a Top 10 Point Guard of All-Time

Similar Posts!

Billups Exposes Chris Paul's Overrated Defense (Incomplete) - 2009 Playoffs 1st Rd
Billups Exposes Chris Paul's Overrated Defense (Incomplete) - 2009 Playoffs 1st Rd

2009 1st Round Chauncey Billups 23-4-7 on 48%, 1.2 TOpg and 66% 3PT Chris Paul 17-4-10 on 41%, 4.8 TOpg Billups completely exposed and outplayed overrated Chris Paul in this series. Billups scored way more efficiently and was the way better playmaker, Paul had quadruple the turnovers as Billups. Billups had a 6:1 ast:to ratio to Paul's 2:1. Knowing that his overrated defense was getting exposed, Paul actually resorted to avoiding guard Billups for long stretches in this series. Billups also shot an insane 19/29 (66%) from 3-point land. To put that in perspective, Steph Curry has yet to shoot 50% on 3-pointers in a playoff series. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Chauncey Billups is vastly superior than Chris Paul as an all-time great point guard. Billups isn't as impressive statistically, but Paul pretty much explains the difference between himself and Billups here, albeit unintentionally. "...He's (Billups) always been a winner... you see some people who, you know, can go out and score 25, 30 points every night, but their teams always lose. He's just a big time winner." Paul is the guy that can put up numbers every night, but not lead his team anywhere. He's basically Tracy McGrady, but with a few first round wins under his belt. Billups is the guy who, regardless of his statistical production, can turn mediocre teams into title contenders, something which Paul can't do regardless of his statistical production. It seems like a strange comparison to make, but Billups vs Paul is similar to Russell vs Wilt. Guys like Billups and Russell make their teams successful, but in comparison players like Paul and Wilt are the guys who put up numbers, but don't have what it takes to bring their teams to the next level, or in Wilt's case, not nearly as often as Russell. And although Billups and Russell's numbers don't always look great, they can put up big numbers when it's needed in addition to making their teams successful (Russell along with Hakeem is the only center to lead a championship team in points (1962) and assists (1965), and set the NBA Finals FG% record in 1965). Paul can only do the former. For example, Billups completely smoked Paul in the 2009 Playoffs, and even outplayed Melo, after Paul had his best statistical year, joining Magic and Kevin Johnson as the only players to average 20+ ppg and 10+ apg on 50% in a season (Magic and KJ did this twice). Billups also outplayed Kobe in the 2004 Finals, so he could dominate statistically if needed, but not at the cost of his team success. On a side note, Paul only outplayed Kobe in the 2011 1st Round, which was the absolute worst playoff run in Kobe's entire career as a starter. The next round, Kobe was outplayed by Jason Terry, so for Chris Paul at his best to outplay Kobe at his absolute worst and lose in the first round is nowhere near as impressive as Billups outplaying Kobe in the 2004 Finals, after Kobe had averaged 25-5-6-2 on 42% through 3 rounds as opposed to 23-3-3 on 45% in the 2011 Playoffs for 2 rounds. Billups from 2003 to 2009 was supremely successful at making his team better to a high degree, something Paul has never done. The Pistons had not made an ECF since 1991 before acquiring Billups, and then made 6 straight ECF under Billups, including 2 NBA Finals and a championship. And Billups made the 2007 and 2008 ECF without the help of 4x DPOY Ben Wallace, and Billups also didn't have Larry Brown after the 2005 Finals, yet still made 3 more ECF without the Hall of Fame coach. Granted, the East was weak after 2006, but likewise the 2009 Pistons were so weak without Billups that they went from 6 straight ECF to 39-wins and a first-round sweep in the weak East, even with Rasheed, Prince, and Hamilton on the team. Billups then came to the tougher Western Conference, and picked up where he left off, taking the 2009 Nuggets from a first round sweep in 2008 to the 2009 WCF, while completely exposing and outplaying Paul in the process. In his first year in the tough Western Conference, Billups did what Paul hasn't been able to do in his entire career, and led a mediocre first round team to the 2009 WCF. And this wasn't even prime Billups. Billups proved he could take any team in the East or West that would normally get swept in the first round and make them a Conference Finals contender, regardless of his statistical production. If you want empty stats, take Chris Paul, but your team damn sure isn't going anywhere. If you want your team to win games and make several Conference Finals, at the very least, and a guy who can still outplay superstars like Kobe (2004), Melo (2009), and Paul (2009) when he has to, Billups is the clear and obvious choice. http://nobodytouchesjordan.blogspot.com/2015/11/section-24-chris-paul-most-overrated.html